Pupil Premium Strategy Statement: Lulworth & Winfrith CE VC Primary School
Detail | Data |
School name | Lulworth and Winfrith CE VC Primary School |
Number of pupils in school | 115 |
Proportion (%) of pupil premium eligible pupils | 14% (16 pupils) |
Academic year/years that our current pupil premium strategy plan covers (3 year plans are recommended) | 2021/2022 to 2024/2025 |
Date this statement was most recently published | December 2024 |
Date on which it will be reviewed | July 2024 |
Statement authorised by | Mr R Skinner, Headteacher |
Pupil premium lead | Mr Skinner |
Governor / Trustee lead | Col Irskin Naylor |
Funding overview
Detail | Amount |
Pupil premium funding allocation this academic year | £23, 545 |
Recovery premium funding allocation this academic year | £15, 407 + £6, 179 = £21, 583 |
Pupil premium funding carried forward from previous years (enter £0 if not applicable) | £0 |
Total budget for this academic year If your school is an academy in a trust that pools this funding, state the amount available to your school this academic year | £45, 128 |
Part A: Pupil premium strategy plan
Our intention is that all pupils, irrespective of their background or the challenges they face, make good progress and achieve high attainment across all subject areas. The focus of our pupil premium strategy is to support disadvantaged pupils to achieve that goal, including progress for those who are already high attainers. We will consider the challenges faced by vulnerable pupils and high-quality teaching is at the heart of our approach, with a focus on areas in which disadvantaged pupils require the most support. We believe this will have the greatest impact on closing the disadvantage attainment gap and at the same time will benefit the non-disadvantaged pupils in our school. Implicit in the intended outcomes detailed below, is the intention that non-disadvantaged pupils’ attainment will be sustained and improved alongside progress for their disadvantaged peers. Our strategy is also integral to wider school plans for education recovery and this includes our Universal Covid Catch Up Premium which is directed towards all pupils in need, including non-disadvantaged pupils. Our approach will be responsive to the challenges and needs of individuals and will be created in response to clear and concise monitoring and evaluations and diagnostic assessments. To ensure the strategies outlined in this plan are effectivey are effective we will:
|
This details the key challenges to achievement that we have identified among our disadvantaged pupils.
Challenge number | Detail of challenge |
1 | Assessments, observations, and discussions with pupils suggest disadvantaged pupils generally have greater difficulties with phonics than their peers. This negatively impacts their development as readers. As a school, we know the importance of developing early reading skills and are keen to work with both the children, their parents and other settings to ensure all children have the resources and support to develop as readers. |
2 | Internal and external assessments indicate that mathematics attainment among disadvantaged pupils is predicted to be below that of non-disadvantaged pupils. In KS2 (2021) 50% of disadvantaged pupils reached ARE in mathematics against 82% for non-disadvantaged. This gap remains a concern through in KS2. |
3 | Although previous data in this area presents a stronger picture, our recent assessments, observations and conversations with parents indicate that the education and well-being of many of our disadvantaged and non-disadvantaged pupils have been impacted by partial school closures to a greater extent than for other pupils. Assessments and observations from class teachers completed since returning to school after two partial closures support these findings. This has resulted in significant knowledge gaps leading to pupils falling further behind age-related expectations, especially in writing. |
4 | Our assessments, including observations, discussions with pupils and their families, have identified social and emotional issues for many pupils. Previously, months of being at home combined with a lack of enrichment opportunities during school closure have added to the mental health and well-being of our disadvantaged children being severely affected. These challenges particularly affect disadvantaged pupils’ attainment, and this is still evident in current cohorts.
Teacher referrals for support (ELSA) have markedly increased post the pandemic. 12 pupils (6 of whom are disadvantaged) currently require additional support with social and emotional needs and have been receiving small group interventions. |
5 | Our attendance data over the last academic year indicates that attendance among disadvantaged pupils has been lower than for non-disadvantaged pupils in some individual cases.
Our assessments and observations indicate that absenteeism is negatively impacting disadvantaged pupils’ progress.
|
This explains the outcomes we are aiming for by the end of our current strategy plan, and how we will measure whether they have been achieved.
Intended outcome | Success criteria |
| Assessments and observations indicate significantly improved oral language among disadvantaged pupils. This is evident when triangulated with other sources of evidence, including engagement in lessons, book scrutiny and ongoing formative assessment.
|
| Year 1 Phonics outcomes in 2022 show that more than 60% of disadvantaged pupils met the expected standard. Year 1 Phonics outcomes in 2024/25 show that more than 80% of disadvantaged pupils met the expected standard.
|
| KS2 maths outcomes in 2022 show that more than 60% of disadvantaged pupils met the expected standard. KS2 maths outcomes in 2023 will not include PPG. KS2 maths outcomes in 2024 show that more than 80% of disadvantaged pupils met the expected standard.
|
| KS2 Writing outcomes in 2022 show that at least 60% (3/5 Current Y6) of disadvantaged pupils meet the expected standard KS2 Writing outcomes in 2023 do not currently include disadvantage pupils. KS2 Writing outcomes in 2024 show that at least 100% (2/2 Current Y4) of disadvantaged pupils meet the expected standard.
|
| Sustained high levels of wellbeing from 2024 / 2025 demonstrated by:
|
| Sustained high attendance from 2022 demonstrated by:
|
This details how we intend to spend our pupil premium (and recovery premium funding) this academic year to address the challenges listed above.
Budgeted cost: £21,900
Activity | Evidence that supports this approach | Challenge number(s) addressed |
Introduce a Support Pro-gramme to provide a blend of TA tuition, mentoring and school-led tutoring for pupils whose education has been most impacted by the pandemic. A significant proportion of the pupils who receive tutoring will be disadvantaged, including those who are high attainers.This will budget for teacher release time and additional recruitment. | Tuition targeted at specific needs and knowledge gaps can be an effective method to support low attaining pupils or those falling behind, both one-to-one: One to one tuition | EEF (educationendowmentfoundation.org.uk) And in small groups: Small group tuition | Toolkit Strand | Education Endowment Foundation | EEF | 1,2,3 |
Purchase of a DfE validated Systematic Synthetic Phonics programme to secure stronger phonics teaching for all pupils. This will be completed in conjunction with our English hub evaluations. | Phonics approaches have a strong evidence base that indicates a positive impact on the accuracy of word reading (though not necessarily comprehension), particularly for disadvantaged pupils: Phonics | Toolkit Strand | Education Endowment Foundation | EEF | 1 |
Improve the quality of social and emotional (SEL) learning.
SEL approaches will be embedded into routine educational practices, through ELSA sessions and supported by professional development and training for staff. | There is extensive evidence associating childhood social and emotional skills with improved outcomes at school and in later life (e.g., improved academic performance, attitudes, behaviour and relationships with peers): EEF_Social_and_Emotional_Learning.pdf(educationendowmentfoundation.org.uk) | 4,5 |
Purchase of standardised diagnostic assessments. Training for staff to ensure assessments are interpreted and administered correctly. | Standardised tests can provide reliable insights into the specific strengths and weaknesses of each pupil to help ensure they receive the correct additional support through interventions or teacher instruction: Standardised tests | Assessing and Monitoring Pupil Progress | Education Endowment Foundation | EEF | 1,2,3 |
Establish a breakfast & after school club available for all disadvantaged families and develop interventions which can support those academically coming to breakfast club. |
| 4,5 |
Targeted academic support (for example, tutoring, one-to-one support structured interventions)
Budgeted cost: £10, 290
Activity | Evidence that supports this approach | Challenge number(s) addressed |
Additional phonics sessions targeted at disadvantaged pupils who require further phonics support. | Phonics approaches have a strong evidence base indicating a positive impact on pupils, particularly from disadvantaged backgrounds. Targeted phonics interventions have been shown to be more effective when delivered as regular sessions over a period up to 12 weeks. | 1 |
Additional early reading support targeted at EYFS & KS1 disadvantaged pupils who require further reading support . | Early reading approaches have a strong evidence base indicating a positive impact on pupils, particularly from disadvantaged backgrounds. Targeted reading support has been shown to be effective. | 1 |
Training and time for Teaching Assistants to implement effective interventions and purchased interventions programmes such as lexia reading, precision teach, inference training and nurture support | Pupil premium lead, SENDCO and subject leads share knowledge of intervention and train support staff on how to lead them and assess them. TAs lead interventions and these are monitored by SLT | 1,2,3 |
Introduce a Tutoring Pro-gramme to provide a blend of tuition, mentoring and school-led tutoring for pupils whose education has been most impacted by the pandemic. A significant proportion of the pupils who receive tutoring will be disadvantaged, including those who are high attainers. | Tuition targeted at specific needs and knowledge gaps can be an effective method to support low attaining pupils or those falling behind, both one-to-one: One to one tuition | EEF (educationendowmentfoundation.org.uk) And in small groups: Small group tuition | Toolkit Strand | Education Endowment Foundation | EEF | 1,2,3 |
Wider strategies (for example, related to attendance, behaviour, wellbeing)
Budgeted cost: £ 12, 938
Activity | Evidence that supports this approach | Challenge number(s) addressed |
Whole staff training on behaviour management and anti-bullying approaches with the aim of developing our school ethos and improving behaviour across school. | Both targeted interventions and universal approaches can have positive overall effects: Behaviour interventions | EEF (educationendowmentfoundation.org.uk) | 4 |
Nurture therapy & ELSA and close support from teaching assistants for those children identifies as needing extra, targeted support with social, emotional issues which affect their learning and progress in school | Teaching assistant hours and ELSA trained staff are directed to support children with additional needs which have come about since the Covid pandemic. They help the children to develop strategies/coping mechanisms/someone to talk in order to help them function on a day-to-day basis | 4, 5 |
Contingency fund for acute issues.
| Based on our experiences and those of similar schools to ours, we have identified a need to set a small amount of funding aside to respond quickly to needs that have not yet been identified. | All |
Embedding principles of good practice set out in the DfE’s Improving School Attendance advice. This will involve training and release time for staff to develop and implement new procedures and appointing attendance/support officers to improve attendance. | The DfE guidance has been informed by engagement with schools that have significantly reduced levels of absence and persistent absence. | 5 |
Use of forest school to focus more in individualised learning in smaller | https://educationendowmentfoundation.org.uk/education-evidence/teaching-learning-toolkit/individualised-instruction | All |
Total budgeted cost: £45, 128
Total Budgeted Cost: £45, 128
Part B: Review of outcomes in the previous academic year
This details the impact that our pupil premium activity had on pupils in the 2023 to 2024 academic year.
Data shows that performance for PPG pupils at KS2 was lower than national standards.
Impact of Pupil Premium Funding During Academic Year 2023 / 2024 KS2 Pupil Premium Outcomes:
|
Key Findings:
KS1 Pupil Premium Outcomes:
Key Findings:
50% of pupils, in receipt of Pupil Premium funding, achieved the expected standard in reading and 50% achieved the expected standard in mathematics and 0% in writing. These are all below the performance of non-pupil premium children. These children have received a negative impact from covid 19 disruption to education and strategies are in place to support these learners.
Year 1 Phonics Screening Check: 68% of children in Year 1 reached the expected level in the 2024 Phonics Screening Check which was completed in Summer 2024.
50% of pupil premium children in this group achieved the standard and 71% of non pupil premium achieved the standard – this is based on a cohort of children that is less than 11.
Intended Outcomes
A new speech and language screening tool has been implemented that has aided the school in identifying and planning around speech and language skills. The impact of this is that 83% of EYFS pupils meet the standard in communication and language which is an improvement since 2023 of +13%
Attainment in writing for PP showed a need to continue to improve in this area. However, this is based on a cohort of 1 PP child in this year group
Feedback from school surveys shows that wellbeing is positive with:
Please include the names of any non-DfE programmes that you purchased in the previous academic year. This will help the Department for Education identify which ones are popular in England
Programme | Provider |
Reading support | Lexia Reading |
For schools that receive this funding, you may wish to provide the following information:
Measure | Details |
How did you spend your service pupil premium allocation last academic year? | We budgeted for a qualified ELSA teaching assistant to dedicate time towards to the emotional wellbeing and academic achievement of service children.
|
What was the impact of that spending on service pupil premium eligible pupils? | Teachers observed improvements in wellbeing amongst service children. Assessments demonstrated progress in subject areas where extra support classes were provided. |